How Strongly SHOULD We Protect and Enforce International Law?
Pauwelyn , Joost, "How Strongly SHOULD We Protect and Enforce International Law?" (March 2006). Duke Law School Legal Studies Paper No. 105 Available at SSRN:
Observers of international law are obsessed with trying to explain and predict why and when states comply with international law. Doing so, they have consistently overlooked a logically preceding, but no less important, question: To what extent should states perform their international commitments? Put differently, how strongly should we protect and enforce international law? Worrying as much about over-enforcement as under-enforcement of international law, this article offers a theory of relative normativity. This theory is driven by efficiency, effectiveness and legitimacy concerns rather than a hierarchy of values. It makes distinctions between how international law allocates entitlements, how it protects entitlements and how it reacts when rules of protection are broken (back-up enforcement). My central claim is that, much like domestic law, international law is best protected on a sliding scale between strict inalienability and simple liability. From that perspective, both what I call European ‘absolutism’ and American ‘voluntarism’ must be avoided as extreme and homogeneous normative frameworks.Go to article
Click here to see more on this topic.
Previous visitors have searched for information on lotus notes attachment, domino lotus software and convert lotus notes to outlook. We do collect this information to update our site to your needs.
Lotus Notes is used by more than 100.000 people world wide. Other e-mail clients are: Citadel , SquirrelMail and Opera M2 and other personal information manager software are: Novell Evolution , MyInfo (Windows) and Act! (Windows) .